Open Access

Im Arbeitsleben wird das Verfolgen moralischer Ziele oftmals durch Hindernisse und Risiken erschwert. Mitarbeiter, die Moral Courage aufweisen, setzen sich auch bei Gegenwind und Schwierigkeiten aktiv für moralische Werte ein und können daher eine wichtige Basis für die ethische Stärke von Unternehmen darstellen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird einerseits ein neues Messinstrument zur Erfassung von Moral Courage am Arbeitsplatz vorgestellt, die Moral Courage at the Workplace Scale (MCWS), und andererseits werden begünstigende und hinderliche Faktoren für Moral Courage untersucht. Die MCWS zeugte in mehreren Studien von guten psychometrischen Eigenschaften sowie konvergenter und divergenter Validität. Es handelt sich um die erste Skala, welche Moral Courage am Arbeitsplatz in verschiedenen, voneinander abgrenzbaren Situationsarten erfasst: dem Eingreifen bei unethischen Handlungen von Kollegen, dem Eingreifen bei unethischen Handlungen von Vorgesetzten, dem Weigern bei unethischen Anweisungen, dem Zugeben von Fehlern, und dem Verfolgen von Ideen. In einem weiteren Forschungsprojekt wurde mit Hilfe kurzer schriftlicher Szenarien ermittelt, wie stark die in einer Situation empfundene Selbstwirksamkeit und die vorhandenen positiven antizipierten Emotionen für die Ausführung und negativen antizipierten Emotionen für die Unterlassung einer moralisch couragierten Handlung mit der Handlungsbereitschaft zusammenhängen. Die Höhe negativer Konsequenzen für den Handelnden wurde in den Szenarien experimentell manipuliert. Selbstwirksamkeit, positive und negative antizipierte Emotionen erwiesen sich in dieser Studie als begünstigende Faktoren und das Risiko für negative Konsequenzen als hinderlicher Faktor für die Bereitschaft, moralisch couragiert zu handeln. Positive antizipierte Emotionen konnten zudem den negativen Einfluss des Risikos auf die Handlungsbereitschaft abfedern. Implikationen dieser Ergebnisse für die Förderung von Moral Courage in Unternehmen werden dargestellt.

Technology entrepreneurship is on the rise around the world. In the quest for change, comparative advantage, innovation creation and socioeconomic progress, a turn to entrepreneurial solutions to persistent developmental challenges has provided a powerful and captivating alternative to past solution approaches. As a consequence, innovation clusters have mushroomed, and an enthusiasm for entrepreneurial activity has caught the attention of many in localities as diverse as Kenya’s Silicon Savannah, Nigeria’s Yabacoon Valley, South Africa’s Silicon Cape, Chile’s Chilecon Valley and Germany’s Silicon Allee, to mention just a few. Yet despite this new, vibrant entrepreneurial activity that continuous to nourish a global wave of excitement, we know little about how technology entrepreneurship is actually performed in these disparate places. This doctoral thesis sought to fill this gap by taking a look “behind the scenes” of one of the most prominent innovation clusters in Africa — Kenya’s information and communications technology (ICT) sector. In this empirical setting, industry participants were in the midst of actively negotiating and rationalizing how technology entrepreneurship needs to work to make it a success, to unlock the benefits of a knowledge economy for Kenya and to carve out a space in the global innovation landscape for innovations made in Africa. Three interconnected academic papers form the core of this thesis. The first paper provides a detailed illustration of the local and global prescriptions that influence entrepreneurial action in Kenya’s ICT sector and inspired the conceptualization of a dynamic process model of globalization. The second paper offers a fine-grained view into the work realities of Kenyans and the generation of the multidimensional work portfolios across which workers diversify their activities to achieve economic survival, create wealth and exert agency for change. The third paper is a theoretical piece that theorizes the process of nonnative organizational forms diffusing and becoming adopted in new organizational environments. All in all, the thesis can be seen as an attempt to study the complexities that reign in African economies through an organizational lens and thus to foster a global organizational scholarship research agenda and discourse that can be of benefit to the many rather than just the few.

Being a next generation member in an enterprising family is accompanied by a central question: What is my role within the enterprising family and why? Taking a unified systems perspective, this dissertation thesis focuses on the next generation in enterprising families and their entrepreneurial roles within the orchestration of three elements: the individual, the family and the business. Taking into account that those three elements constantly influence each other and change over time, this dissertation thesis introduces a more holistic understanding of the next generation in enterprising families. Using a multiple-role approach conceding that the next generation can have more roles within the enterprising family next to being the successor, this dissertation thesis encompasses three studies on overall 413 next generation members focusing on their entrepreneurial roles within the family business and new venture context. This dissertation thesis uses different methodological (quantitative and qualitative) and theoretical approaches (family, social cognition and organizational behavior science) to address the limited knowledge about the different roles of the next generation within the enterprising family. Study 1 focuses on the family business versus new venture context and aims at understanding how the intentions and actions of entrepreneurial roles of the next generation emerge and develop over time. Study 2 investigates the entrepreneurial roles of the next generation within the family business and how it shapes their strategic decision making within this context. Study 3 researches the role of the next generation as a founder of an own venture, and how the enterprising family shapes the venture creation process. By that, this dissertation thesis contributes to: (1) obtaining a better understanding of the family side in entrepreneurship, which becomes especially well-observable from the (to date) under-researched perspective of the next generation in enterprising families, (2) creating a common understanding that the next generation can have entrepreneurial roles within the enterprising family beyond being the successor in the family business, which offers the opportunity to understand how entrepreneurial behavior develops within life stages and life cycles of a family and how entrepreneurship is transferred through generations, (3) emphasizing the relevance of the next generation within the family as well as the business side in investigating the potential entrepreneurial capacity of enterprising families and their business initiatives contributing to theory building on enterprising families, and (4) providing further research aspirations concerning the next generation and their roles in enterprising families, including ideas for future research on how to assess the entrepreneurial roles of the next generation within the enterprising family.

To further strengthen European integration much can be done and is actually needed. The present work provides a wide range of empirical results and corresponding policy recommendations from the perspective of economics. The collection of articles here provides a clear illustration that there is a lot of potential to amend the architecture of the European Union and the euro area, respectively. It is well understood that the process of European integration is a continuous process which requires adjustments from time to time. This thesis provides results which indicate that very specific measures, such as facilitating a catch-up in terms of institutional quality by central and eastern European countries, would be beneficial for the process of European integration. This is in line with the general claim that institutional harmonization has to be enhanced. It is shown that within the more narrow framework of the euro area measures to enhance the functioning of the single currency are needed as well. In sum, this implies a strong need for policy measures in response to the recent developments of European integration. Moreover, it is demonstrated that common rules have to be equally binding for all countries. In fact, a number of necessary policy measures are already being implemented, for example the implementation of Basel III. With respect to implementation, results of this thesis imply that such measures have to be implemented carefully. Policy makers have to take into account country-specific characteristics when implementing one-fits-all policy measures. Nonetheless, the uniform European rules are not questioned here. In addition to the results and corresponding policy recommendations, the bulk of the research done here also contributes methodologically to economics. The increasing availability of micro-data is used to address macroeconomic questions and derive corresponding macroeconomic results and implications. Future research in economics will most likely make more and more use of such data.

With the ripple effects of the global financial crisis of 2008 exhibiting enduring rifts in the global economy to date, an assessment of the crisis as being rooted in both market and regulatory failure sheds light on the significance and the severity of the challenges cross-border financial capitalism presents nation states with in the wake of globalization. As externalities increase, the threats the unprecedented interdependence and instability of the modern financial system pose are unlikely to recede; on the contrary, they are bound to become more pressing. This is of considerable significance for financial governance, implying that sovereign nation states – formally legitimized to conduct regulatory functions – must construct robust cross-border structures to cope with the challenges of governing an inherently crisis-prone system. In an attempt to address the underlying shortcomings exposed by the crisis – among them that the regulatory and supervisory architecture was not commensurate with the complexity and sophistication of financial markets – the European Union embarked on an ambitious reform path. The potential capacity of European integration in this regard, though central in the academic debate, has yet to be analyzed systematically with respect to systemic risk in terms of both its systemic qualities and political embeddedness. Drawing on a refined definition thereof set out by Willke et al. (2013), this research aims to shed light on how these themes resonate in the European context to inform the critical analysis of conducted reforms. Based on the assumption that cross-border finance requires integrated governance schemes to ensure its integrity and efficacy, the central goals are to (i) assess both systemic-risk related reform measures and the challenges they are confronted with, and (ii) illuminate the significance of reform, while underpinning the case for enhanced integration. Drawing on a broad theoretical framework combining insights from various EU integration theories to trace the rationale and assess the potential and significance of supranational integration, and constructing an analytical framework within which to assess the order-, legitimacy- and expertise-related challenges current structures are confronted with, i.e. factors inhibiting governance capacity, the research concludes that though substantive reforms have largely failed to address the core systemic issues exposed by the crisis, there has indeed been substantial progress in terms of the reform of the institutional governance architecture at the European level. While monumental challenges remain, it would be premature to discredit the response in its entirety. The analysis highlights the European Union’s remarkable capacity to adjust, with institutional responses essentially at the boundaries of legal and political feasibility. Given what is at stake, however, it contends that – with a view to future challenges – supranational governance regimes remain short of optimal scope and must be strengthened to forestall the gradual erosion of governance capacity vis-à-vis an increasingly interdependent and fragile financial system.

Die vorliegende Arbeit liefert eine erste empirische Untersuchung zum Einsatz digitaler Medien in der Aus- und Weiterbildung von Fahrlehrern und zeigt anhand einer Fallstudie zur internetgestützten Videoreflexion auf, welche Chancen, aber auch Hürden hier bestehen. Die Hauptaufgabe von Fahrlehrern ist es, Fahrschüler zu sicheren, verantwortungsvollen und umweltbewussten Verkehrsteilnehmern auszubilden. Dafür benötigen Fahrlehrer Lehrkompetenz, die sie bereits in ihrer Ausbildung erwerben sollten. Jedoch fehlen in der Fahrlehrerausbildung bislang bewährte, standardisierte Methoden der Lehrkompetenzförderung. Aus dem Kontext der Lehrerbildung ist bekannt, dass die Reflexion eigener und fremder Unterrichtsvideos eine gute Methode darstellt, die Lehrkompetenz (angehender) Lehrpersonen zu fördern. Digitale Medien ermöglichen eine schnelle und einfache Bereitstellung der Unterrichtsaufnahmen über Online-Plattform sowie eine internetgestützte Videoreflexion mittels Videoannotation. Die Implementation solcher moderner Ansätze gestaltet sich in der Praxis jedoch oft schwierig: Innerhalb einer Einrichtung müssen unterschiedliche Dimensionen, Ebenen und Einflussfaktoren berücksichtigt werden, um eine nachhaltige Implementation einer Innovation zu ermöglichen. Gerade in der Fahrlehrerausbildung stellt dies eine Herausforderung dar, weil bislang keine empirischen Erkenntnisse zum Einsatz digitaler Medien in diesem Kontext vorliegen. Vor diesem theoretisch erarbeiteten Hintergrund wird im empirischen Teil der Dissertation anhand einer qualitativen Fallstudie mit vier Fällen aus drei Ländern die Implementation der internetgestützten Videoreflexion in der Fahrlehrerausbildung untersucht. Es wird betrachtet, inwiefern sich das Konzept zum Einsatz der internetgestützten Videoreflexion in der Aus- und Weiterbildung von Fahrlehrern implementieren lässt und welcher individuelle sowie organisationale Mehrwert daraus entsteht. Die Ergebnisse der Fallstudie zeigen, dass in keinem der vier untersuchten Fälle die internetgestützte Videoreflexion nachhaltig in die Aus- und Weiterbildung von Fahrlehrern implementiert wurde, obwohl alle Beteiligten einen Mehrwert in der Videoarbeit sehen. In der Praxis zeigten sich unterschiedliche Schwierigkeiten und Hürden: Oftmals gab es keine klare Struktur der Einsatzkonzepte und keine feste Integration der Videoarbeit in den Lehrplan der Ausbildung. Darüber hinaus hat keine der beteiligten Einrichtungen ein ökonomisches Modell entwickelt und ihre Strukturen und Rahmenbedingungen dauerhaft so verändert, dass eine nachhaltige Implementation der internetgestützten Videoreflexion in die Aus- und Weiterbildung von Fahrlehrern möglich wäre. Letztendlich stellt die Struktur der Fahrlehrerausbildung eine Hürde dar: Die gesetzlichen Vorgaben lassen kaum Spielraum, neue Angebote in die Ausbildung zu integrieren, gerade wenn es um virtuelle Elemente geht.

Familienunternehmen stellen weltweit die am häufigsten vorkommende Unternehmensart dar. Führung, Finanzierung und strategischen Ausrichtung spielen in vielen dieser Unternehmen nicht nur ökonomische, sondern auch familienbezogene Aspekte eine wichtige Rolle. Hieraus begründet sich, dass die Aufrechterhaltung der Kontrolle und somit die Steuerung des Familienunternehmens neben der wirtschaftlichen Nutzung für einen Familienverbund eine wichtige Rolle spielen. Wie jedoch auch in anderen Unternehmen, kann es in einem Familienunternehmen durch falsches Management, Krisenzeiten oder Finanzierungsprobleme zu Situationen kommen, in denen es der Familie nicht möglich ist, das Familienunternehmen ohne externe Unterstützung zu führen und zu kontrollieren. Gerät ein Familienunternehmen durch wirtschaftliche Schwierigkeiten in eine Situation, in der die Aufrechterhaltung der vollen Kontrolle über das eigene Unternehmen nicht mehr realisierbar ist, können für die Familie der Verkauf des Unternehmens oder die Unterstützung eines externen Eigenkapitalgebers infrage kommen. Der Wunsch, das Unternehmen über Generationen hinweg in Händen der Familie zu bewahren, scheitert oft an dem bloßen Mangel an (willigen) familieninternen Nachfolgern. Auch aus dieser Notsituation heraus kann es sich ergeben, dass der Ausstieg aus dem Familienunternehmen infrage kommt. Der Verkauf oder die Hereinnahme von Eigenkapital kann in diesen Fällen an bzw. durch einen strategischen Investor erfolgen. Möglich ist jedoch auch, einen Private Equity-Investor in das Familienunternehmen aufzunehmen. Auf den ersten Blick haben Familienunternehmen, die in der Regel gegenüber Stakeholdern altruistisch geführt sind, und hochprofessionalisierte Private Equity-Gesellschaften oft wenig gemeinsam. Umso interessanter ist somit die Frage, welche Motive ein Private Equity-Investor verfolgt, wenn er sich an einem Familienunternehmen beteiligt oder es sogar vollständig erwirbt. Zugleich stellt sich in diesem Zusammenhang die Frage, welchen Einfluss ein institutioneller Investor auf das frühere Familienunternehmen ausübt und welche Veränderungen in einem Zielunternehmen aufgrund des –teilweise vollständigen– Wegfalls des Familieneinflusses eintreten. In diesem Zusammenhang ist insbesondere die Frage interessant, ob die Abnahme des Familieneinflusses negative Folgen für das Unternehmen hat, ob also geschlussfolgert werden kann, dass ein Unternehmen, das sich in Händen von Unternehmerfamilien befindet, effizienter wirtschaftet, oder ob das genaue Gegenteil der Fall ist. Hierdurch lassen sich zum einen Aussagen darüber treffen, welche Verbesserungspotentiale in einem Familienunternehmen bestehen, die durch einen professionellen, renditeorientierten Investor ausgenutzt werden, aber auch, welchen Mehrwert Familien in einem Unternehmen möglicherweise generieren. Durch eine Betrachtung verschiedener Gruppen von Familienunternehmen, die sich auf Grundlage der operativen und finanziellen Situation des Zielunternehmens ergeben, sowie durch Betrachtung verschiedener Vorgehensweisen des Investors im Zuge des Buyouts, kann zudem untersucht werden, welche unterschiedlichen Motive und Auswirkungen sich aus diesen Faktoren für den Private Equity-Investor und das Familienunternehmen ergeben. Untersucht werden sowohl die Motive als auch die Entwicklungen der Zielunternehmen nach dem Buyout anhand eines hand-gesammelten Datensatzes, bestehend aus Familienunternehmen, die in den Jahren von 2000 bis 2009 einen Buyout durch einen Private Equity-Investor durchlaufen haben. Hierbei werden sowohl gesamte Jahresabschlüsse als auch Informationen zu der Zusammensetzung des Gesellschafterkreises, des Managements und eines eventuell bestehenden Kontrollgremiums zur Analyse herangezogen. Auf Grundlage dieser Daten ergibt sich ein klares Bild darüber, in welche Arten von Familienunternehmen Private Equity-Gesellschaften in Deutschland investieren und welche Auswirkungen die Buyouts auf die Zielunternehmen unter verschiedenen Bedingungen haben. Abschließend wird die Frage geklärt, welche Faktoren aus Sicht des Investors dafür entscheidend sind, dass die Transaktion erfolgreich verläuft. In Bezug auf die Investitionen von Private Equity-Gesellschaften werden in der Literatur aufgrund der deutlich höheren Verfügbarkeit vornehmlich Public-to-Private-Transaktionen analysiert und anhand dieser Theorien der Einfluss und die Motivlage von Private Equity-Gesellschaften untersucht. Diese Art der Transaktion macht im Bereich Private Equity jedoch nur einen sehr geringen Teil aus. Die Motivlage und die Auswirkungen des Investments in ein Familienunternehmen wurden aufgrund der hohen Verschwiegenheit dieses Unternehmenstyps und daraus folgenden geringen Verfügbarkeit an empirisch auswertbaren Daten bisher nicht untersucht. Diese Forschungslücke soll in der vorliegenden Arbeit mithilfe empirischer Analysen der Ziel-Familienunternehmen geschlossen werden.

People face economic decisions on a daily basis. Quite often, these decisions involve high stakes and some degree of personal risk, as choices produce real consequences that set the course for future actions. Although decades of decision research in the intersection of psychology, behavioral economics, and neuroscience have much advanced our knowledge about the psychological underpinnings of economic decisions, several academic disputes remain unsettled. Indeed, surprisingly little is known about the role of motivation and volition in guiding economic decisions. Certainly, people’s motives, goals, and their expectations of attractive rewards are important drivers of decision making. Yet, motivation and volition cannot be reduced to goals and incentives. The cognitive mechanisms underlying economic decisions are rather complex, and motivation and volition may impact decisions at the level of these cognitive processes. This dissertation considers the role of motivation and volition in economic decisions by examining the impact of experimentally induced motivational and volitional states of mind on economic choices and decision processes. Using different methods and decision making paradigms, four experiments provide novel evidence that informs the ongoing debates in motivation research, decision science, and psychophysiology. In short, Experiments 1a and 1b explore the possibility of interactive effects between motivation, volition, and financial incentives in determining economic performance. Moving on to the level of decision processes, Experiment 2 examines the impact of motivation and volition on decision processes under risk. Decision times, eye movements, and pupil dilations provide process measures of cognitive effort, pre-decisional information search, and affective arousal, respectively. Finally, Experiment 3 investigates how particular decision attributes relate to affective and motivational processes in decisions under risk. The findings of the present dissertation can be summarized in terms of four main conclusions. First, incentives are effective for improving economic performance when the payment of attractive monetary rewards is contingent on performance. Yet, higher incentives do not further improve performance. Second, the experimental manipulation of motivational and volitional mindsets does not directly affect choices, but notably impacts decision processes. Third, the influence of motivation and volition on economic decisions appears to depend on the appropriate incentivization of the task at hand. Fourth, risky choice attributes that entail no gain at all, i.e., zero-outcomes, elicit high levels of affective arousal and motivational avoidance tendencies that guide selective attention and decision making in the lottery choice paradigm. The implications of these findings are discussed for theory development in motivation research and decision science, as well as in terms of their practical implications for decision making in managerial contexts and other high-stakes decision environments.

Organizations that aim at delivering essential goods and services to low-income populations a the base of the pyramid increasingly blend the social welfare and the commercial logics in an effort to create financially sustainable solutions to social problems. Scholars have portrayed these cross-sectoral hybrid organizations as particularly agentic and resilient in institutionally complex settings, highlighting their ability to turn institutional voids into opportunity spaces. At the same time, the reconciliation of two antagonistic goals, namely poverty alleviation and financial value creation, as well as the multiple institutional voids that hybrid organizations face at the base of the pyramid (BoP) expose them to severe tensions. By investigating eight hybrid organizations in four countries, namely Colombia, Mexico, Kenya and South Africa, the present study contributes to a better understanding of cross-sectoral hybrid organizations in BoP settings in two ways. First, it shows that hybrid organizations not only face tensions between sector logics, but also between formal and informal, as well as between “Western-style” and “local style” strategic action fields. In settings which do not effectively provide guidance on the prioritization of social vs. financial objectives, these institutional voids manifest as tensions over goals and tensions over means in hybrid organizations. Second, the study sheds light on how field-level dynamics influence the ability of hybrid organizations to strategically employ factors that spur legitimacy advantages in an effort to turn institutional voids into opportunity spaces. Two different scenarios have been identified. One scenario refers to Colombia, Mexico and Kenya, which have been classified as fields that don’t effectively enforce a dominant sector logic concerning the legitimate way that health services should be provided to low-income populations. The present study has shown that in such fields, an organization’s logic of origin as well as the personal background of founders are factors that may spur legitimacy advantages in hybrid organizations. In effect, organizations which strategically employ these factors can select more freely from competing logics and ultimately overcome the prevailing tensions. This resonates with previous research, which has suggested that in fields with a dominant logic, hybrid organizations may take advantage of legitimacy advantages if their logic of origin corresponds to the dominant logic at the field level (Pache and Santos, 2012). However, the present study suggests that the factors leading to legitimacy advantages are more complex in fields with no effective dominant logic regarding social service provision. Here, the dominant logics among funding organizations, possible legitimacy spill-over effects from other market players, as well as the specifications of the commercial and the social welfare logics become important sources of possible legitimacy advantages. However, the study suggests that an organization’s ability to employ them strategically is dependent on their time of founding and their size. In addition to these findings, the study also provides insights on cross-sectoral hybridization in fields with a weakly enforced dominant logic, which is the second scenario that has been identified in South Africa. In particular, the study suggests that in such settings, hybrid organizations are more restricted to freely draw from competing logics, given that they face effective, normative imperatives about the goals they should pursue. However, the empirical investigation also indicates that an organization’s resource dependence structure is more influential than the encountered normative claims of audiences in health fields at the BoP. Further research is needed to refine these insights and explore cross-sectoral hybridization in social service provision fields in contexts of a weakly enforced dominant logic. Based on these findings, the author derives a range of practical recommendations that may themselves be interpreted as paradoxical. As the empirical study suggests, blended value creating hybrid organizations in Colombia, Mexico and Kenya currently face legitimacy advantages when originating from a commercial origin. The researcher is thus, on the one hand, inclined to recommend them to position themselves as commercially oriented organizations as to take advantage of the legitimacy advantages that the commercial logic currently entails. On the other hand, she cautions actors in the field of blended value creation, particularly funding entities, not to neglect the actual role of nonprofit organizations. The establishment of (health) markets that provide low-income populations in developing and emerging economies with affordable, high-quality products and services is likely to require significant unprofitable efforts. Finally, hybrid organizations in South Africa need to be more careful when adopting structures or practices from the commercial logic given the low legitimacy that this logic has in the health market at the BoP. There, organizations need to thoroughly analyze the institutional claims in the specific context of post-Apartheid South Africa.

This study was designed to answer the question of whether resource performance depends more on good governance or rather on effective institutional structures. The specific aim is to make clear the extent to which good governance and institutions promote small scale gold mining businesses, to explain empirically the nature of human rights challenges in the small-scale mining (SSM) industry from the perspective of mining mangers, to investigate the nature, determinants, and frequency of conflicts associated with SSM, and to discuss the challenges facing SSM operations and ways to confront them. The findings show that, in the context of efforts to spur economic development, the exploitation of mineral resources has the potential to bring about far-reaching environmental and social changes. These changes can create opportunities, but they also represent a business risk for corporations and a social risk for communities. There is as a consequence a pressing need to investigate recent threats to mineral resource exploration relating to economic development, peace and stability, and the survival of private businesses. These threats are particularly serious for less-developed countries that are net exporters of natural resources. Such countries could use these resources to drive economic development and decrease their dependence on aid from developed countries. In most of them, however, owing to a lack of strong institutions, mismanagement of mineral and other natural resources has fueled social conflict without producing meaningful development. In addition, there is often the perception in countries such as Ghana, which is the subject of this study, that mining, whatever its benefits, is responsible for significant environmental damage and for Human Rights Adverse Impacts (HRAI), including child labor and exploitation, displacement of rural households, and violence. For these reasons, investment in the mining sector and associated businesses has often faced stiff resistance. Given the right governmental institutions, small-scale gold mining and associated activities can prove beneficial to and be accepted by a society and can attract further investment; under the wrong circumstances, this type of mining can impact society negatively. At the very least, when SSM is poorly managed, the anticipated benefits to the business community and the broader society are unlikely to materialize. The evidence from large-scale mining, particularly in the wake of Ghana’s civil war, indicates a correlation between mineral resources and conflict. Less is known about the nature, frequency, and causes of conflicts that afflict households in Ghana’s artisanal mining communities. There is accordingly a need for research into ways to prevent human rights violations and to create share value in the SSM sector through social development and renewed incentives for investment in it. This thesis represents an attempt to fill this need by exploring whether the capacity of resources—in this case, gold mining—to spur economic development—here, by creating competitive SSM businesses, improving livelihoods, or reducing poverty—depends on governance structures and whether there is a correlation between SSM and conflict outside the context of civil war. This thesis is informed by three broad insights. The first concerns the challenges facing the SSM activities that play a vital role in the Ghanaian economy. Second, there is the importance of the role played by institutions in the development of SSM amid renewed attraction of investment in the sector. Third, changing social expectations are a crucial aspect sustainable mining and the protection of human rights.